President Donald Trump held a phone call with Vladimir Putin, discussing the Ukraine conflict, but stated it was “not a conversation that will lead to immediate Peace,” with Putin vowing a “very strong” response to recent Ukrainian attacks
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine was a central topic in a recent phone call between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, though Trump acknowledged it was “not a conversation that will lead to immediate Peace.”
Also read: Elon Musk slams Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill” as disgusting abomination, vows political payback
The call, which lasted approximately one hour and 15 minutes, took place on Wednesday, June 4, 2025.
According to President Trump’s statements on Truth Social, the leaders discussed “the attack on Russia’s docked airplanes, by Ukraine, and also various other attacks that have been taking place by both sides.”
He notably conveyed that “President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields.”
This suggests a potential escalation in the ongoing conflict, which has seen a series of Ukrainian drone strikes deep within Russian territory, including on airbases.
The conversation comes amidst stalled peace talks between Ukraine and Russia. While President Trump has previously expressed a desire to quickly resolve the conflict, this latest exchange indicates significant hurdles remain.
Putin’s strong declaration of retaliation suggests a firm stance from Moscow, making immediate diplomatic breakthroughs unlikely.
Beyond Ukraine, President Trump also stated that he and Putin discussed Iran’s nuclear programme.
Trump asserted to Putin that “Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon,” and believed they were in agreement on this point.
He also mentioned that Putin “suggested that he will participate in the discussions with Iran and that he could, perhaps, be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion.”
This recent interaction highlights the complex and often challenging nature of US-Russia relations, particularly concerning critical global issues like the Ukraine conflict and nuclear proliferation.
While the conversation was described as “good,” it underscores the deep-seated disagreements and the considerable distance that separates the two nations on the path to a lasting peace in Ukraine.
